|
Post by Oloos Opinion on Dec 29, 2005 21:40:17 GMT 3
Registrar won’t destroy coming ODM tsunami By Onyango Oloo
Some goose who loves bananas and is allergic to citrus fruits had a brainwave recently.
How about, the said silly goose/gander wondered, wandering around Nairobi, if I went to the Registrar’s office with few friends and called ourselves the Orange Democratic Movement “Party”?
All we need are three people to act as promoters of our paper organization.
“Brilliant!” The said goose/gander told himself/herself in a moment of private smug-self congratulation.
“That will really show them! That will really stick it to them!”
The “them” in question is none other than the leaders of the REAL Orange Democratic Movement.
The trio involved in this blatant case of identity theft are John Miriti Mbarire who has anointed himself the “Chairman” of the fake ODM; a certain Joseph Bunei who secured the coveted “Treasurer” slot and Ms Wangui Miringi, as of now the all powerful “Secretary” of the mythical paper organization. Their chief accomplice was none other than Deputy Registrar Lucy Waithaka (Yes the same lady who denied the Mwananchi Party the right to be a legal political entity in this era of multiparty democracy in Kenya).
This attention-grabbing act of fraud and impersonation was good music to the enemies of the real ODM.
Most people could not believe that ODM had been registered by some outsiders. To the people who registered the ODM name, that was their right! We live in a democratic Kenya and what they did was perfectly within the law!
However, the move shows the fear that the “Bananiacs” have for the ODM. They are assuming that the Orange Democratic Movement needs to be registered in order for them to use their name. But they are forgetting that ODM has been doing that from the outset.
I know from my own experience that when someone rushes to steal your name, he or she is directly saying that you are formidable and that they can only get attention by pretending to be you.
The fingers of the Kenya government are all over that certificate of registration. Surely a senior person like Ms Lucy Waithaka, Deputy Registrar cannot feign ignorance and declare that prior to the arrival of the fake ODM trio that she had never, ever heard of a name like the Orange Democratic Movement. Further, she cannot claim to be oblivious to the obvious confusion that would arise from registering a fake outfit trying to pass itself off as one of the most well known political formations in Kenya today. Given her stubborn refusal to register the Mwananchi Party, one can only assume that the alacrity with which she rushed to register the fake ODM is not devoid of overt political and partisan bias on her part and she will find it very hard to convince me that she did NOT vote for the Banana team in the just concluded referendum.
It is unfortunate that someone who is supposed to be a career civil servant could stoop this low. Nevertheless, it is crucial to put things into appropriate perspective. At worst, the registration of the fake ODM is a minor irritant and flash in the pan prank.
One has to bear in mind that William Ruto, Raila Odinga, Uhuru Kenyatta, Kalonzo Musyoka, Najib Balala, Omingo Magara, Mwandawiro Mghanga, Julia Ojiambo, Nazlin Rajput, Bonaya Godana, Musalia Mudavadi and other Orange leaders succeeded in building the brand name of the Orange Democratic Movement that will make any imitation look ludicrous. I remember unscrupulous knock-off merchants who have tried to cash in on famous brand names by for instance calling their product “MIKE” instead of “NIKE”.
Millions of Kenyans know what the REAL Orange Democratic Movement is all about and nothing that a trio of government-assisted tricksters try to do at the Registrar’s office will dissipate that.
On the contrary, NAK is going to suffer a backlash, not so much because of the silliness of the fake leaders of the fake ODM knock off, but rather, because one of the government’s senior offices openly participated in perpetrating a mischievous naked subterfuge. Further, by working in cahoots with the fake ODM trio, NAK is demonstrating that they are still smarting and are yet to recover from their stinging referendum defeat from last month.
Cloning the real Orange Democratic Movement via proxy moronic minions is the sincerest act of NAK flattery who will continue to suffer defeat for as long as they remain reactive rather than pro-active as the momentum of the ODM’s tsunami is unaffected.
source: Kenya Times Online
|
|
|
Post by Matunda on Dec 29, 2005 21:43:56 GMT 3
Oloo,
I have read your gripe on this issue and the attack on the "leaders" of the newly registered ODM. Their act is clearly intended to frustrate the ODM from using the name.
Your attack on the registrar, however, is unwarranted. I think the law requires that you cannot register party/business/association/etc using the same name as another registered party/business/association/etc. Legally speaking the registrar did her job - performed a name search in the registry of parties/businesses/associations/etc and there was no ODM in the files and then proceeded to register the party. The registrar has no obligation to anticipate someone coming to register a party/business/association/etc of the same name in the future!
That aside, you have to appreciate that competition for power is a slugfest in which opponents use as many tools as they can; ODM has been beaten on this one step! And for me, what matters is that the competition be fair and no one breaks the law. The new ODM "leaders" haven't broken the law as far as I can tell; they merely went a step ahead of the real ODM! (BTW: what were Kalonzo, Raila, Ruto, Uhuru, Balala and all those ODM luminaries doing when this happened?)
In 1966 the KPU was registered by some nondescript individuals that were not even in political mainstream. At the time, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga was battling to keep his perch as the country's vice-president. Soon he would resign and was "invited" to lead the KPU! Many people know the truth to be that Jaramogi actually initiated the KPU registration in preparation for his departure from government having lost out in the power struggle within the Kenyatta government.
The new ODM "leaders" clearly are acting on some people's behest. What they have not done is nothing new! It has been around for many years and no laws were broken.
And that is politics; a very raw form politics at that!
Matunda
|
|
|
Post by Migunas Response on Dec 29, 2005 21:47:49 GMT 3
Matunda/Oloo & others:
I'm only responding to this issue because of the "legal" issues raised. I will deal very briefly with this question:
1. There is no legal requirement that one registers an entity prior to operating, even a business, using that "particular name." One is permitted, (even here in Canada), to use a "name" for a period of time (say six months) before registeration it. Within that time, if it becomes "common knowledge" like it was with the ODM, then it is incumbent upon the Registrar of Companies or Societies in this matter to refuse to "register" a name on behalf of those who cannot PROVE that they are the "legitimate" owners/operarors or signing authorities for the "entity" that is well known. Law cannot permit unscrupulous conduct on the part of those purporting to register an entity. Deception or fraud are not legal. If all that was required in law was for one to be cunningly deceptive, then I believe that some of us may not even be allowed to use our own names since some clever fraudster can beat us at the registration desk.. If that was all it was my brother Matunda, then we will be living in a legal jungle where the only requirement for registration is being the "fastest" one to reach the Registrar's Office. For example, it is conceivable that each time a group of people discuss about an idea, say of the formation of a political party, any "simple thief" with a set of light feet will become the automatic owner of that outfit on the basis that he or she reached the Registrar's Office first! I'm not sure whether any sane person would want to live in such a society. Maybe Kenya has degenerated to that level.
Hence, the issue is not simply that of who "presented" the name ODM to the Rgistrar first. Clearly, the Registrar cannot claim to have been ignorant of who the "legitimate leaders" of ODM are/were.What the Registrar did in this case is not just unethical, it is plainly illegal.
As for the political intrigues, I leave that for your speculations. However, one has to remember that Kenyans KNOW who constitutes ODM, just as they know WHO they will elect when the time comes. It will not depend on what one calls oneself. Remember that ODM was unknown a few months ago. The same way it came from nowhere to capture the dreams, aspirations and support of the majority of Kenytans, the same way any other name or symbol will. In any event, both LDP and Kanu are still intact and registered. These were and remain the political vehicles. Those who claimed ODM was an amorphous entity should not shed crocodile tears over its registration...
But maybe this unnecessary debate on this irrelevant issue is what those behind the registration intended...
[unedited]
-Miguna-
|
|
|
Post by Maina on Dec 29, 2005 21:50:34 GMT 3
Matunda, I agree with you that the law was not broken while the registrar ent ahead and processed the registration of ODM. However, she is to somewhat blame. She should have exercised due diligence and handled this with the aplomb of a competent Registrar. A Registrar's office should avoid "counterfeits" whether the real ODM was officially registered or not. In my opnion she should have done more than reasonably "perform her duties". This fake ODM now sees and feels itself the cynosure of every eye. How unsettling especially at this present time when all attention should be focussed to the residents of North Eastern Province. The true ODM should now take this as opportunity to bravely demonstrate their ability to extemporise intelligently. Hopefully this will always keep them ahead! Maina
|
|
|
Post by Matunda on Dec 29, 2005 21:51:49 GMT 3
Miguna,
You know well that I am NOT a lawyer; I will defer the matter to those more conversant in that sphere.
If indeed ODM feels agrieved that they have been "robbed" of their name, they know what to do - challenge the ODM owners in a court of law. It is one reason why courts exist - to resolve matters in dispute.
What I know is that the current ODM owners (not the Balalas, Rutos, Kalonzos, Railas, etc.) have the legal right to the use of the name, unless the courts say so.
Of course the registrar may have been aware of the political implications of what she was doing; what is a fact is that prior to the registration of ODM as a party by the "new owners", there was no party in the books by the same name.
Let's bear in mind that what we are seeing is real politics. As far as I know there are both clean and dirty tricks that make politics interesting and of great intrigue. If you believe that the ultimate success in politics is the acquisition and retention of power, then you can appreciate what people are prepared to go through to win power. A good case study on the use of dirty tricks is the Dukakis-Bush in the USA campaign of 1988 where the former was defeated purely due to negative advertizing.
I have witnessed so many such things to be surprised by the goings on in Nairobi. Even at constituency level I have seen such things happen. In one case, a candidate planted his own people in the opponent's camp who then proceeded to claim they would sign the opponent's nomination papers. And surely all turned up at the time of nomination only to discover that many of them did not carry identity cards; the opponent failed to get enough people to sign his nomination papers. Last minute efforts to seek alternatives failed and the candidate never recovered; never ran again for parliament as people scoffed at the man's naivety and ease with which he was "defeated"!
Politics is not simple: you plan, connive, fight, and at every instance work to reduce your opponent's chances of winning power. In this see-saw winners aren't the saints that they sometimes claim to be - eti they would like to server Wanjiku! Their interest is power and the trappings that come with it!
ODM went to sleep after the sweet referendum; I don't blame them for their naivety! They should be more adept at the game of politics and in this one instance they have been caught sleeping! True and sad; but it is no cause of celebration.
Matunda
|
|
|
Post by Migunas Response on Dec 29, 2005 21:53:28 GMT 3
Matunda,
There are two issues here; one legal and the other political mischief.
If we are serious about the Rule of Law, then we have to be consistent on how to apply the Rules and the Law. The application must be legally valid and consistent. Let's apply this legal argument to this particular case.
1. The Registrar must have been well aware of what ODM was and who its leaders are. Her search was not restricted to the "Registry Records." Her search was supposed to include ALL RECORDS; public and non public. Public records include court records as well as information in the public domain such as media reports. Clearly, one has to be completely dishonest to claim that anyone could have secretly registered ODM to some unknown individuals not legally instructed to do so by the LEGITIMATE ODM and its leaders. Consequently, any purported "registration" becomes null and void, as it was done without "verifying" whether or not the "new owners" were acting at the behest of the "real owners." Law does not exist in a vaccuum. Therefore, this matter should not even go to court since the Registrar's action is null and void. But if it does end up in Court, the defendant must surely be the Registrar and the responsible Minister (or in our case, the AG). It is these goons that should be made to pay for the "damages" and costs associated with such unnecessary litigation
2. We have to choose, as Kenyans, whether we shall be governed by the Rule of Law or the Law of the Jungle. The former entails that nothing be done unless it is both legitimate and legal. What the Registrar pretended to do was both illegitimate and clearly illegal. We cannot have it both ways. To support such illegitimate, underhanded, fraudulent and deceptive conduct on the part of our politicians and officeholders is tantamount to perpetuating illegalities and jungle-mentality that is inconsistent with the entrenchment and the institutionalization of the Rule of Law in our country. Anybody who is cheering on these fraudsters must critically examine his or her commitment to the Rule of Law. We cannot encourage this kind of practice, for to do so is to encourage fraud. How can we say that we want CORRUPTION to end in Kenya, yet be gleeful when we see corruption in what the Registrar just pretended to do?
3. The Rule of Law requires that politics not be a factor at all in legal matters. By that I mean that the Registrar should never have allowed herself to be the agent of political mischief. To claim that this kind of practice is ramptant in Kenya is neither a justification nor does it address it. We need to tackle these issues boldly without any concern as to what political party or politicians are the perpetrators or the aggrived ones.Why would anyone go to court and litigate such obvious frauds? C'mon!
4. We cannot change anything in Kenya if all we are capable of is saying "These things happen all over...politics is not easy." There is nothing political about what has happened; only illegal, criminal mischief! Let us call a spade a spade.
Let's be serious people. [unedited] -Miguna-
|
|
|
Post by Matunda on Dec 29, 2005 21:57:41 GMT 3
Miguna,
Some quick observations:
Politics is a dirty game; politics doesn't exist in a vacuum just as the law doesn't exist in a vacuum; whether the registrar was playing mischief or not is a matter of perception; Banana supporters will cheer; ODM will cry foul and the courts should rule on the matter if asked to do so;
Commenting on the goings on is NOT CHEERING anyone! It is ok for people to make observations and laugh at the dirty game of politics; I look at the naivety of some of our so called political luminaries and laugh! True we all want a system of rule of law. I also know that one cannot codify into every possible action for one cannot anticipate every possible human behaviour! This means that to play the game one must look not simply where one is going but also who would be stabbing one on the back!
The claim of ownership of the ODM name has not been challenged in court nor ruled upon; perhaps you can offer your counsel to the ODM if they ever wish to win the name back, otherwise they will be impeded by legal obstacles associated with the requirement that parties operate as legal registered entities;
All this debate is based on speculation that ODM had/has plans (if any) of converting itself into a political party; if such plans existed, then they have the right to contest use of the name in the Kenyan courts; if (as my hunch tells me) they had no such plans, this debate is moot and those who have registered the ODM party may well end up empty-handed, except for the ODM certificate of registration. And why do I have a hunch that ODM may never become a party? Simple - Kanu and LDP (or better still NEW KANU under the last regime) are busy strategizing for the next year as they build their grassroots. If ever they create an alliance, each one would like to come to the table well strengthened to drive a tough bargain. My view is that the referendum campaign was a spur of the moment that created a common enemy - the Kibaki regime - that led to the emergence of the ODM. I wouldn't call the ODM's registration criminal; mischievious - yes! We all wish that Kenya would change for the better and we are working for that better society; making an observation about dirty trciks and politics does not suggest that we don't want a better Kenya. Bringing change requires one to understand the nature of the problem, the working of politics (including dirty tricks) and then being prepared accordingly. I haven't heard of a society where politics was a clean game; if one hopes for such a society, then I welcome them to dream on.
Matunda
|
|
|
Post by Joe on Dec 29, 2005 21:58:43 GMT 3
Matunda, As a tangential observation on your interesting point on the game of power-grabbing in Kenya, and looking at the current political situation, it seems like ODM failed to heed their own warning of an approaching political tsunami to move to higher grounds until the tsunami subsided. One wonders what ODM's strategy is to get out of the current (political) low grounds they find themselves in (out of power) right now. Did they get swept by the tsunami? Are they still getting to the higher grounds of political power? I remember when they scoffed the guys with power right and said they wouldn't talk to them (Kibaki). Now I hear they want to talk to them (negotiate). Interesting! Yes: watching the game of power-grabbing can be fascinating. It'll be interesting to see how things unfold in the periods ahead as ODM (now the underdogs) fight to grab power into their own hands. How they use that power when they get it will be another issue altogether. I wish they had a big, clear ideological stand which is different from the current adminstration, that we all can talk about it and make our stand on it. Many people wonder what they'll get under the ODM regime that's drastically revolutionary from the current regime. More later... Happiest & Prosperous New Year. Joe
|
|
|
Post by Migunas Response on Dec 29, 2005 21:59:57 GMT 3
Matunda,
If we are serious about wanting Kenya to change for the better, then we cannot joke about things such as these. Our seriousness must be judged based on both our stated comments as well as our actions. Joking about serious issues reducees our commitment and undermines our purpose.
Bw. Matunda, something becomes "illegal" if it is forbidden by "law" or "official rules." Please review the statements being made by the REAL ODM in the Kenyan press and look again at my comments and you will undoubtedly agree with me that an illegality occured here. There is no need to quibble with this matter.
The Registrar's job is not POLITICAL. So, where does "politics" get into this? Why don't we just examine this as an unethical, illegal and unprocedural work of an unscrupulous public official? Aren't there legal consequences to such unbridled illegalities? Why, for heaven's sake, are we even debating this?
In a society governed by the Rule of Law my brother, the Registrar would be facing charges in court. That's where the case should be - a criminal court; not a civil one.
If (God forbid) you returned from work one day and found some pretender (thief) holding what looks like your PhD certificate with his name on it, arguing that merely because he had his name scrawled over yours, he is the "legal owner" of the diploma. Will you go to a civil court or you will immediately call the RCMP or local police? Not a very good example, but a close one. Theft is theft no matter how it is executed. Confronted with a thief, we should not stop and marvel at the thief's ingenuity. We simply dial 911; don't we?
To suggest that we "cannot codify all conduct" is really to reduce this into some minor "indiscretion." Well, you and I know that it is not. [unedited]
-Miguna_
|
|
|
Post by Matunda on Dec 29, 2005 22:00:54 GMT 3
Miguna, I will let other speak on this. I want to make a couple of comments. In your mesage below, you say that the registrar's job is "not political" yet you would like her to do exactly that: consider that there exists out there some entity called ODM and refuse an application by people (other than the NO-related politicos) to register a party by the name ODM. Her job is legal and she doesn't operate in a political vacuum! My recollection is that the law requires a name search and if no entity exists of the same name in the books the registrar issues a certificate to the applicants as long as they have fulfilled the rest of the registration requirements! Secondly, in Kenya political parties exist as legal entities in order to compete in the political arena. The ODM of Raila, Kalonzo, Ruto and others exists in our imagination and that of its proponents. It has no offices, officials, articles of association or anything that could make it close to a legal entity! Only an intention has been expressed of registering the party by leaders of the NO side in the recent referendum. (From www.dictionary.com a legal entity is defined as : an entity (as a corporation or labor union) having under the law rights and responsibilities and esp. the capacity to sue and be sued.) Given the above, the case cannot be compared with someone taking my doctoral certificate because my certificate exists in reaity: I can feel it, touch it, etc. The NO side's ODM doesn't exist, except in the wishes, imagination and conjures of people's minds, including yours, mine, those of its founders and many others out there! This comparison therefore is MOOT. Taking your definition of the term "illegal" (something forbidden by law) how does Mrs Waithaka's actions become illegal? Under what law is she forbidden from registering parties that meet legal criteria? I would argue that she acted legally by interpretting the law "literally" and found the application to register ODM to have met the conditions of the law. I will leave others speak on this subject; I doubt we will ever reach the same conclusions because obviously our approach to the matter is coloured by our own biases! Matunda
|
|
|
Post by Aboge on Dec 29, 2005 22:01:53 GMT 3
DP opratives never stop giving ODM propaganda ideas! Watch ODM get quite a bit of political mileage out of this. Since wanainchi beat them, now theyre frantic trying to use the registra's office in fighting ODM. Who is the the sorry strategist for DP? Hillarious!
|
|
|
Post by Maina on Dec 29, 2005 22:03:08 GMT 3
It is one thing to be naive in the sense that one is innocent but your fretful remarks below are oblivious of the political atmosphere in Kenya. What exactly is your point? Well, they say that nowadays it is about as big a crime to be dumb as it is to be dishonest! Firstly, the ODM euphoria is completely ineluctable! I will not even attempt to explain myself further on this one. Secondly, Kenya is not where it is today on account of one man. It is here on account of the real common sense of the Big Normal Majority. We elect our Presidents, regardless of their political party/affiliations, then start daring them to make good. President Kibaki has totally failed Kenya. Kenyans know it and nothing can change the course of events to come......not even yours, the President's or the President's cohorts' blandishments! Lastly, a famous American cowboy once said, "A man that don't love a horse, there is something the matter with him. If he has no sympathy for the man that does love horses then there is something worse the matter with him." I suggest you ride with the times and avoid being soooo clamourous! Maina.
|
|
|
Post by Kihara on Dec 29, 2005 22:04:08 GMT 3
Miguna
I live in Toronto but only know of you in Cyberspace. From looking at some of your articles in the Kenya times, you are noted as a barrister practicing in Toronto. I am assuming that you are registered in Kenya as well. If I disagreeumption is correct then you are in a position to show which Kenyan statutes were violated by the registration of ODM party.
Please educate me and others who might be interested in this matter. Asante
|
|
|
Post by Migunas Response on Dec 29, 2005 22:05:14 GMT 3
Matunda,
You are right on one thing - we will not agree on this.
1. Things don't simply exist because you can touch and smell them Matunda. Even ideas you cannot touch "exist." I thought that you, Matunda, know a thing or 2 about "itellectual property." Do you have to touch an idea to own it? Do you need a registration certificate? Can you touch your NAME? Please note that your body corporal and your NAME are two different things. Your name is not even the same as your birth certificate; and names exist without birth certificates.
Anyway, on ODM, you are wrong. ODM exists - the one you are saying is in the imagination. We know its leaders. We have seen them address rallies and press conferences. ODM won the referendum on 21 Nov. 2005. It is recognized as such by all and sundry, including the newspapers. One has to be hallucinating to say that it doesn't exist.
ODM does not need a registration certificate to exist; just as MWAKENYA did not. Or are we in doubt about Mwakenya or the December 12th Movement? By the way, did so-called "clandestine" parties and movements exist during the one-party system? Did the Kenya Socialist Congress of Odinga and Anyona exist? Merely because it was not registered does not mean that it never existed.
Does the Lords Resistance Army in Northern Uganda exist? Did Alice Lakwena's movement exist? Before Muzeveni's NRM/NRA captured power, was it registered anywhere? How about Garang's SPLA/SPLM? Were they ever registered in any Registrar's office in Sudan before the peace was ratified last year? Really, do movements exist merely on the basis of their registration? Was the ANC registered in South Africa from 1910 to 1994? Did it exist when Mandela, Sisulu etc were jailed? How about the South African Communist Party? Did they exist after they were banned?
How about MAU MAU? Do you want to tell me that MAU MAU only existed in our imaginations because it was never registered? Could you touch it? In what way was the MAU MAU different from the ODM in terms of its "existence" or lack thereof?
Let us be real? You know you can't win this one; don't you?
2. As on illegalities; I think I've spoken. Let others be the judge.
|
|
|
Post by Matunda on Dec 29, 2005 22:06:03 GMT 3
Ok,
Mau Mau was a clandestine movement as was Mwakenya as was Museveni's NRM as is the Lords Resistance Army as any of those you have named!
ODM (the one resulting from the NO campaign) wants to compete in open electoral politics and as far as I know they don't intend to do so clandestinely! as did Mau Mau, NRM, the Lords Resistance Army or Mwakenya.
There is a difference!
Matunda
|
|
|
Post by Matunda on Dec 29, 2005 22:07:20 GMT 3
The fact that we are spending time on the subject underlines the attention the ODM has obtained.
Whoever did the ODM registration might in the end not benefit much, especially if ODM chooses not to fight the battle and opt for another name; indeed, even if they fight the battle and lose/sin, they would have been in the glare of the media for a while and as we all know publicity is the oxygen on which politics thrives!
It also demonstrates demonstrates the fact that a coin has two sides! Any issue has a potential of being a double-edged sword.
Matunda
|
|
|
Post by Akombe on Dec 29, 2005 22:08:14 GMT 3
We need not fight. If the Uhuru camp thinks that something illegal took place, let them fight it in court. We have very little facts about the case so we cannot pass judgment.
This is not the first time that we have seen this kind of competition in Kenya. Year in year out, different factions from different parties rush to the registrar to have her recognize them as bona fide officials of parties. This often ends in court. The case at hand is no different. It is all about politics that translates to nothing in terms of service to Wanjiku.
People in North Eastern are dying from hunger. I have neither seen the Orange nor the Banana team charter planes to ferry food to the starving people. I bet that if there was an election today, the airspace of NE will be crowded with different types of planes. The ground will be saturated with Bananas and Oranges. Now where are those Bananas and Oranges that our too-fat-to-think politicians were distributing to be used as missiles?
R. Akombe
|
|
|
Post by hijamo on Dec 30, 2005 4:39:27 GMT 3
Ladies and gentlemen ,our sons and daughters of kenya ,to begin with i wish all of you a merryXmas and a happy new year. Let us stop squabbling like children,The ODM has been mandated by the majority of the kenyan people and the Govt knows this. There is no question on this issue take it or leave it. We are not here to preach to a gang of ruling class that has been defeated on 21st november on referendum.and that has shown its disregard of the law. Kenyan people and the ODM knows better, its leaders are young educated Elites and have served in KANURegime. Both ODM leaders and mps in the gk including Kibaki are tainted but since ODM leaders has decided to protect and to lead kenyans in this time of need, where the ODM stood up with the masses of oppressed kenyan . We as Kenyans has the right to give our moral support to ODM in order to lead our nation to greater heights no matter what. REmber without the ODM patriotism and Nationalism the GK of kibaki would have given kenyans a Flawed Draft Constitution. To come back to the real issues Whatever the gk does as from now should be noll and void. By registering (faking) ODM party using (bandits) is purely nonsense ,Evil, Sin, and punishable but since ODM lacks its Own Prisons to jail Conmen ,the only thing for the ODM to do is just to appeal to all kenyan masses to stand up and take back their stolen BIRTHRIGHT to its original and Genuine Owners.And this should be now. How do you deal or fight with a mad -Dog invected with Rabies? Ponder that one,I leave it to you .How do you cure Cancer; the best way to cure cancer is to report direct to the hospital and get youself examined by an Expert Doctor .Why or Specialist doctor the answer is because some doctors miss cancer only to detect it late when this killer decease happened to spread all over the body. But according to many Cancer specialists a cancer can be cured or diagnised if detected in early stages. ODM leaders first must have the ability to examine problems with precise attention . Must rember they are fighting what we call Criminal-aristocracy in kenya. This is no time to dwell in theories The time for theories is over and any leader within ODM who thinks that there is any other method to deal and to negotiate with (maffias) is a day dreamer , coward and traitor.(muuzanji) ODM leaders should not relay on Wazunguz Advice because Wazunguz are there to protect the interests of their countries. They lack the love of our people ,Some are even there to see to it that slaves are kept in toe. to them status quo is OK. The GK is not oppressing a mzungu , Muhindi or Mwarabu . In Fact time is calling for all kenya intellectuals to stop to all this individualism, and from now on literature and art should be political ,its aim should be to glorify the kenyan masses.Theories must cease ,because the masses has no time for theories.One Action is better than a thousand phamplets.
|
|